airlockedmods: (Default)
airlockedmods ([personal profile] airlockedmods) wrote in [community profile] theairlock2017-05-21 12:50 pm
Entry tags:

Week 2

[Other than the reappearance of the Overseer, there's no real change in the routine. PAL still makes the morning and night time announcements through the PIP on each Champion's arm, and still the Champion unitards are freshly laundered and re-hung each morning in their closets.

No other floors unlock, but Cece and Kip will still be appearing randomly to chit-chat.

All you know is... something has to change soon.]


Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday




[ooc: Don't forget to to turn in your AC for week 1 and submit your threads for the Benefactors!]
scourgingstars: (if i look hard enough)

[personal profile] scourgingstars 2017-05-26 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
That's obvious, is it not? The ones who benefit are either those watching or orchestrating this situation.
misanthropicprinciple: <user name="jilli-bean" site="tumblr.com"> (Challenger.)

[personal profile] misanthropicprinciple 2017-05-26 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
They're the ones who'd have written PAL's "contract," too. So in some ways, it doesn't even matter if it's acting on its own, or if it shows us a weakness. It's the ones behind it that we have to figure out.
scourgingstars: (i must have it painted black)

[personal profile] scourgingstars 2017-05-26 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
In other words, the puppet should be the least of our concerns next to the ones holding its strings.
misanthropicprinciple: <user name="pidgegunderson" site="tumblr.com"> (Said the skeptic skeptically...)

[personal profile] misanthropicprinciple 2017-05-26 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
At the very least, their motives make more sense than PAL's. And they'd be able to call off their robo-dog while it's sitting on our life support systems.
scourgingstars: (i'm scared; i doubt)

[personal profile] scourgingstars 2017-05-26 10:26 am (UTC)(link)
The only thing they or PAL have to gain from cutting that off is a very short production with a sudden finale. Unless the risk we present should outweigh any benefit they seek from this whole affair, I assume us to be safe on that front.
misanthropicprinciple: (It's been 43 yeARS)

[personal profile] misanthropicprinciple 2017-05-26 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
It'd make for a good incentive to drive an otherwise well-meaning person to kill. A single death, or every life here? I've seen people threatened with similar situations.